Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
tools_to_fight_a_disinformation_campaign [2020/02/05 10:42] – [Tools to fight against a disinformation campaign] editor117tools_to_fight_a_disinformation_campaign [2020/04/07 17:13] – editor116
Line 3: Line 3:
 **Because smears against Assange are many and correct information often lacks.** **Because smears against Assange are many and correct information often lacks.**
  
-(Fr) [[Éléments pour combattre la campagne de désinformation]]+Voir aussi (Fr) [[Éléments pour combattre la campagne de désinformation]]
  
 ==== Debunking all the Assange smears ==== ==== Debunking all the Assange smears ====
Line 15: Line 15:
 After a visit in Sweden in 2010 Julian Assange was accused of sexual misconduct by two women there. Assange complied with the preliminary investigation and the case was soon closed a first time because the prosecutor saw no crime. It was opened again later, by a different prosecutor... After a visit in Sweden in 2010 Julian Assange was accused of sexual misconduct by two women there. Assange complied with the preliminary investigation and the case was soon closed a first time because the prosecutor saw no crime. It was opened again later, by a different prosecutor...
 Then started a long series of legal battles supposedly intended to shed light and bring justice to all parties in this case when in fact only the injustice grew thicker, with Assange being vilified as a rapist in the press even though he had never been charged with any crime. Assange always claimed his innocence, all the while continuing to collaborate with the investigation even when he was in political asylum inside the Ecuadorian embassy and limited in movements for fear of an extradition to the US.  Then started a long series of legal battles supposedly intended to shed light and bring justice to all parties in this case when in fact only the injustice grew thicker, with Assange being vilified as a rapist in the press even though he had never been charged with any crime. Assange always claimed his innocence, all the while continuing to collaborate with the investigation even when he was in political asylum inside the Ecuadorian embassy and limited in movements for fear of an extradition to the US. 
-The questionable way the investigation was conducted, the years of legal procrastination and irregularities that followed were neither fair to the women nor to Assange. They were in fact detrimental, instrumental only to the political persecution of the WikiLeaks founder. UN rapporteur on torture Nils Melzer even concluded this investigation “was the primary factor that triggered, enabled and encouraged the subsequent campaign of sustained and concerted public mobbing and judicial persecution against Mr. Assange in various countries, the cumulative effects of which can only described as psychological torture.”+The questionable way the investigation was conducted, the years of legal procrastination and irregularities that followed were neither fair to the women nor to Assange. They were in fact detrimental, instrumental only to the political persecution of the WikiLeaks founder. UN rapporteur on torture [[https://challengepower.info/nils_melzer|Nils Melzer]] even concluded this investigation “was the primary factor that triggered, enabled and encouraged the subsequent campaign of sustained and concerted public mobbing and judicial persecution against Mr. Assange in various countries, the cumulative effects of which can only described as psychological torture.”
 The investigation is now closed for the third time, for lack of evidence.  The investigation is now closed for the third time, for lack of evidence. 
  
  • tools_to_fight_a_disinformation_campaign.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/09/18 18:52
  • by editor117