Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
tools_to_fight_a_disinformation_campaign [2020/02/05 10:39] – editor117 | tools_to_fight_a_disinformation_campaign [2020/02/05 10:42] – [Tools to fight against a disinformation campaign] editor117 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===== Tools to fight against a disinformation campaign ===== | ===== Tools to fight against a disinformation campaign ===== | ||
- | because | + | **Because |
(Fr) [[Éléments pour combattre la campagne de désinformation]] | (Fr) [[Éléments pour combattre la campagne de désinformation]] | ||
- | === Debunking all the Assange smears === | + | ==== Debunking all the Assange smears |
Caitlin Johnstone debunks all the Assange smears and gives tips for how to argue against smears using facts, logic, and wise use of one's energy | Caitlin Johnstone debunks all the Assange smears and gives tips for how to argue against smears using facts, logic, and wise use of one's energy | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
https:// | https:// | ||
- | === Understanding the Swedish case === | + | ==== Understanding the Swedish case ==== |
After a visit in Sweden in 2010 Julian Assange was accused of sexual misconduct by two women there. Assange complied with the preliminary investigation and the case was soon closed a first time because the prosecutor saw no crime. It was opened again later, by a different prosecutor... | After a visit in Sweden in 2010 Julian Assange was accused of sexual misconduct by two women there. Assange complied with the preliminary investigation and the case was soon closed a first time because the prosecutor saw no crime. It was opened again later, by a different prosecutor... | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The questionable way the investigation was conducted, the years of legal procrastination and irregularities that followed were neither fair to the women nor to Assange. They were in fact detrimental, | The questionable way the investigation was conducted, the years of legal procrastination and irregularities that followed were neither fair to the women nor to Assange. They were in fact detrimental, | ||
The investigation is now closed for the third time, for lack of evidence. | The investigation is now closed for the third time, for lack of evidence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Findings of Nils Melzer, UN rapporteur on torture === | ||
== "A murderous system is being created before our very eyes" == | == "A murderous system is being created before our very eyes" == | ||
Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
https:// | https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Analyses === | ||
== Collapse of Swedish " | == Collapse of Swedish " | ||
Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
https:// | https:// | ||
- | |||
== We are women against rape but we do not want Julian Assange extradited == | == We are women against rape but we do not want Julian Assange extradited == | ||
Line 72: | Line 75: | ||
https:// | https:// | ||
- | |||
== Justice 4 Assange == | == Justice 4 Assange == | ||
Line 80: | Line 82: | ||
https:// | https:// | ||
- | === The "not a journalist" | + | ==== The "not a journalist" |
== Is Assange a journalist ? == | == Is Assange a journalist ? == | ||
Line 88: | Line 90: | ||
https:// | https:// | ||
- | === Paranoia ? NO === | + | ==== Paranoia ? NO ==== |
Here is the text of the indictment, the US charging Assange with 17 counts of Espionage. | Here is the text of the indictment, the US charging Assange with 17 counts of Espionage. | ||
{{: | {{: |