Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
the_assange_precedent [2020/02/16 17:47] feistyspinachthe_assange_precedent [2020/02/16 20:48] feistyspinach
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== The "Assange Precedent" ====== ====== The "Assange Precedent" ======
  
-If the US succeeds in prosecuting the publisher and editor of WikiLeaks,for revealing information the US says is“secret”, it will open  the  flood  gates  to  an extremely  dangerous  precedent. Not  only  will  the  US  government  immediately seize on the precedent to initiate further prosecutions, states the world over will follow  suit  and  claim  that  their  secrecy  laws  must  apply  globally  too. Assange’s co-publishers  at Der  Spiegel,  Le  Monde,  New  York  Times,  Espresso and  The Guardian, among others, will also risk immediate prosecution in (and extradition to) the US. The prosecution of Assange will have a profound chilling effect on the press and national security reporting. Publishers should not be prosecuted,in the US or elsewhere,for the “crime” of publishing truthful information.+If the US succeeds in prosecuting the publisher and editor of WikiLeaks, for revealing information the US says is “secret”, it will open  the  flood  gates  to  an extremely  dangerous  precedent. Not  only  will  the  US  government  immediately seize on the precedent to initiate further prosecutions, states the world over will follow  suit  and  claim  that  their  secrecy  laws  must  apply  globally  too. Assange’s co-publishers  at Der  Spiegel,  Le  Monde,  New  York  Times,  Espresso and  The Guardian, among others, will also risk immediate prosecution in (and extradition to) the US. The prosecution of Assange will have a profound chilling effect on the press and national security reporting. Publishers should not be prosecuted,in the US or elsewhere,for the “crime” of publishing truthful information.
  
 The extradition and prosecution of Julian Assange would post an invitation to other states to follow suit, severely threatening the ability of journalists, publishers and human rights organizations to safely reveal information about serious international issues. If the Trump Administration can prosecute an Australian journalist in Europe for publishing material on theUS, why can’t Russia prosecute an American journalist in Washington revealing secrets about Moscow? Why can’t Saudi Arabia prosecute a Turkish journalist forrevealing secrets about the Khashoggi murder? The extradition and prosecution of Julian Assange would post an invitation to other states to follow suit, severely threatening the ability of journalists, publishers and human rights organizations to safely reveal information about serious international issues. If the Trump Administration can prosecute an Australian journalist in Europe for publishing material on theUS, why can’t Russia prosecute an American journalist in Washington revealing secrets about Moscow? Why can’t Saudi Arabia prosecute a Turkish journalist forrevealing secrets about the Khashoggi murder?
Line 61: Line 61:
 https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v74vey/why-brazils-charges-against-glen-greenwald-are-an-absolute-red-alert https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/v74vey/why-brazils-charges-against-glen-greenwald-are-an-absolute-red-alert
  
 +=== Assange’s Extradition Case: Critical Moment for the Anti-War Movement ===
  
 +The US government’s extradition and prosecution of Julian Assange is a critical moment for press freedom, but also for the anti-war movement. This aggressive government’s assault on journalists poses grave danger to peace, for without a press that is free and independent, truth that has the power to stop wars is defenseless.
 +
 +https://www.commondreams.org/views/2020/02/16/assanges-extradition-case-critical-moment-anti-war-movement
  
  • the_assange_precedent.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/05/13 20:11
  • by miumiu