Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| spying_on_assange_inside_the_ecuadorian_embassy [2020/02/26 14:46] – created editor113 | spying_on_assange_inside_the_ecuadorian_embassy [2020/04/24 00:08] – editor116 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Spying on Assange inside the Ecuadorian Embassy ====== | ====== Spying on Assange inside the Ecuadorian Embassy ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Technical aspects of the surveillance in & around Ecuadorian embassy ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Technical aspects of the surveillance in and around the Ecuadorian embassy in London - Details about the man hunt for Julian Assange and WikiLeaks | ||
| + | |||
| + | https:// | ||
| Line 34: | Line 41: | ||
| The usual remedy for warrantless surveillance is to exclude any illegally obtained information from the trial, but that remedy is inapplicable here. The government’s advantage in surveilling Assange is not the acquisition of tangible evidence but, rather, intangible insights into Assange’s legal strategy. There is no way, therefore, to give Assange a fair trial, since his opponents will know every move he will make. | The usual remedy for warrantless surveillance is to exclude any illegally obtained information from the trial, but that remedy is inapplicable here. The government’s advantage in surveilling Assange is not the acquisition of tangible evidence but, rather, intangible insights into Assange’s legal strategy. There is no way, therefore, to give Assange a fair trial, since his opponents will know every move he will make. | ||
| - | When Assange begins his extradition hearing, this will be part of his argument — that the CIA’s misbehavior violates his human rights by depriving him of his right to a fair trial. | + | In Assange´s |
| https:// | https:// | ||