US granted limited permission to appeal January decision that Julian Assange should not be extradited

 The UK High Court has notified the parties involved in Julian Assange’s extradition
 case that the United States government’s appeal will be listed for a hearing.

 The decision by the High Court simply gives permission for the US government to attempt
 to challenge the ruling, but it does not reflect the merits of the US arguments.

 Permission has been granted on a limited basis, allowing only narrow, technical grounds
 to form the basis of the appeal. Crucially, the High Court did not allow the United
 States to appeal any of the factual findings concerning Assange’s condition. No date
 has been set for the hearing.

 Assange's extradition was blocked in January on the grounds that it would be
 “oppressive”, citing the circumstances of the extradition, as well as his clinical
 history and Autism Spectrum disorder diagnosis, which, combined, would drive him to
 suicide. The High Court affirmed Judge Vanessa Baraitser’s conclusions concerning his
 clinical condition, as well as the independent expert evidence on which she relied.

 Assange faces a sentence of 175 years in prison if extradited.

 The appeal was lodged by the Trump Administration, just two days before President Biden
 took office, but revelations reported last weekend dealt a new blow to the credibility
 of the Department of Justice case.

 Icelandic investigative journalists revealed that the DoJ’s lead witness, an Icelandic
 man convicted of sex crimes against minors, fraud and embezzlement, who is also a
 diagnosed sociopath, now admits that he fabricated allegations against Assange in
 exchange for immunity from US prosecutors ([1]https://stundin.is/grein/13627/). Those
 discredited allegations form the basis of the Second Superseding indictment against
 Assange and were even cited in the extradition judgment delivered on January 4^th.

  Julian Assange’s fiancee, Stella Moris, said:

  “Six months ago, Judge Vanessa Baraitser blocked the extradition of my partner, Julian
 Assange, because consigning him to the US prison system would have amounted to signing
 his death warrant. That should have been the end of it.

 "The new revelations concerning the DoJ's lead witness, Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson,
 confirm what we all knew: that the case against Julian has been built on lies. The case
 is rotten to the core, and nothing that the US government can say about his future
 treatment is worth the paper it is written on.  This is a country whose agents plotted
 to kill Julian on British soil; who harried his solicitors and stole legal documents;
 who even targeted our six-month-old baby.

 This entirely baseless, abusive, anti-First Amendment case was driven by the previous
 administration for nefarious reasons. The administration instrumentalised the law to
 pursue the political objective of disappearing Julian as a deterrent to journalists in
 the United States and elsewhere.

  "I am appealing directly to the Biden government to do the right thing, even at this
 late stage. This case should not be dragged out for a moment longer. End this
 prosecution, protect free speech and let Julian come home to his family.

   “The current administration admits that the Trump Department of Justice lacked
 independence. It seems inconceivable that President Biden would want to continue with
 this case – because Julian’s freedom is coupled to all our freedoms and no democratic
 society can ever make journalism a crime.

 “If the Biden Administration does not end this now, the case will limp through the
 courts while Julian remains in prison indefinitely: unconvicted, suffering and
 isolated, while our young children are denied their father. Julian spent his 50th
 birthday on the 3rd of July behind bars in Belmarsh prison, where he has been on remand
 since April 2019. He is not a criminal. He is a journalist and a publisher, and he is
 being punished for doing his job.

 “This case shows nothing but contempt for the First Amendment. Repressive regimes
 welcome the Biden administration's prosecution of Julian because it signals that
 imprisoning the press and silencing political dissent is practised and endorsed by the
 United States. Bringing this shameful prosecution demeans the values that the United
 States says it stands for. It reduces trust in both the US and the UK legal systems.

 “Julian’s prosecution is vigorously opposed by The New York Times and the Washington
 Post, as well as the National Union of Journalists, Amnesty International, Reporters
 Without Borders and virtually every press freedom and human rights organisation in the
 West, together with parliamentarians from around the world”.

 Lawmakers in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and Australia have renewed their calls
 for the Biden Administration to abandon the prosecution as international political
 pressure grows. A group of German MPs have written to Chancellor Angela Merkel, asking
 her to raise the issue with President Biden during her forthcoming trip to Washington.

References

 1. https://stundin.is/grein/13627/