Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
jail_the_war_criminals [2021/04/05 17:41] – babjail_the_war_criminals [2021/04/05 18:07] – created bab
Line 5: Line 5:
 It is time to re-examine the case in the light of the journalist torment. It is time to re-examine the case in the light of the journalist torment.
  
-In 2003, the UK joins the US in the invasion of Iraq , based on lies. (([[https://www.dw.com/en/the-iraq-war-in-the-beginning-was-the-lie/a-43301338|https://www.dw.com/en/the-iraq-war-in-the-beginning-was-the-lie/a-43301338]]))+In 2003, the UK joins the US in the invasion of Iraq , based on lies. (([[https://www.dw.com/en/the-iraq-war-in-the-beginning-was-the-lie/a-43301338|https://www.dw.com/en/the-iraq-war-in-the-beginning-was-the-lie/a-43301338]])).
  
 +Early in 2003 Katharine Gun, a young GCHQ translator, leaked a document, subsequently passed to the Observer, showing how the US had asked GCHQ to bug the phones of diplomats from the so-called UN “swing states” – countries believed to be open to persuasion to back an invasion of Iraq.. ((https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/02/usa.iraq))
  
 In 2016, after 7 years of inquiry, the Chicot Report, publishes its conclusion and recognizes that the invasion and subsequent occupation  of Iraq was unnecessary and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of individuals as well as the displacement of over 4 million others. In 2016, after 7 years of inquiry, the Chicot Report, publishes its conclusion and recognizes that the invasion and subsequent occupation  of Iraq was unnecessary and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of individuals as well as the displacement of over 4 million others.
Line 14: Line 15:
 But the international crime of a war of aggression had been accepted by then UK attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross QC in the 1940s, at the time of the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war crimes. But the international crime of a war of aggression had been accepted by then UK attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross QC in the 1940s, at the time of the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war crimes.
  
-The UK government has been given “de facto domestic immunity” because “as long as it fails to enact legislation which makes the crime of aggression a domestic criminal offense, any leader can act as he/she chooses knowing that whatever action they take, it can be taken with complete impunity(Imran Khan, solicitor).+The UK government has been given “de facto domestic immunity” because “as long as it fails to enact legislation which makes the crime of aggression a domestic criminal offense, any leader can act as he/she chooses knowing that whatever action they take, it can be taken with complete impunity (Imran Khan, solicitor for plaintiff).
  
 Do Tony Blair and his co-conspirators will ever be held accountable for their lies and theirs consequences onthe life on millions of people ? Do Tony Blair and his co-conspirators will ever be held accountable for their lies and theirs consequences onthe life on millions of people ?