Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionLast revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
jail_the_war_criminals [2021/04/05 17:38] – created bab | jail_the_war_criminals [2021/04/05 18:07] – created bab | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
It is time to re-examine the case in the light of the journalist torment. | It is time to re-examine the case in the light of the journalist torment. | ||
- | In 2003, the UK joins the US in the invasion of Iraq , based on lies. (([[https:// | + | In 2003, the UK joins the US in the invasion of Iraq , based on lies. (([[https:// |
+ | Early in 2003 Katharine Gun, a young GCHQ translator, leaked a document, subsequently passed to the Observer, showing how the US had asked GCHQ to bug the phones of diplomats from the so-called UN “swing states” – countries believed to be open to persuasion to back an invasion of Iraq.. ((https:// | ||
- | In 2016, after 7 years of inquiry, the Chicot Report, publishes its conclusion and recognizes that the invasion and subsequent occupation | + | In 2016, after 7 years of inquiry, the Chicot Report, publishes its conclusion and recognizes that the invasion and subsequent occupation |
Despite all efforts to prosecute the ones in charge, the High Court of UK, has ruled in 2017 , that there is no crime of aggression in English law under which the former prime minister could be charged. | Despite all efforts to prosecute the ones in charge, the High Court of UK, has ruled in 2017 , that there is no crime of aggression in English law under which the former prime minister could be charged. | ||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
But the international crime of a war of aggression had been accepted by then UK attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross QC in the 1940s, at the time of the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war crimes. | But the international crime of a war of aggression had been accepted by then UK attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross QC in the 1940s, at the time of the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war crimes. | ||
- | The UK government has been given “de facto domestic immunity” because “as long as it fails to enact legislation which makes the crime of aggression a domestic criminal offense, any leader can act as he/she chooses knowing that whatever action they take, it can be taken with complete impunity(Imran Khan, solicitor). | + | The UK government has been given “de facto domestic immunity” because “as long as it fails to enact legislation which makes the crime of aggression a domestic criminal offense, any leader can act as he/she chooses knowing that whatever action they take, it can be taken with complete impunity (Imran Khan, solicitor |
Do Tony Blair and his co-conspirators will ever be held accountable for their lies and theirs consequences onthe life on millions of people ? | Do Tony Blair and his co-conspirators will ever be held accountable for their lies and theirs consequences onthe life on millions of people ? | ||
Line 44: | Line 45: | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
- | * [[https:// | + | * [[https:// |