Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| extradition_skeleton_argument [2020/02/27 00:30] – editor9367251490216 | extradition_skeleton_argument [2020/02/27 00:33] (current) – editor9367251490216 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 766: | Line 766: | ||
| 169. The defendant' | 169. The defendant' | ||
| - | 170. The superseding indictment is brought on the basis of the rule of law and not to prosecute the defendant for his political opinions. A motion for selective prosecution (which could be brought on the basis that the prosecution was brought for a discriminatory purpose) may be filed if the defendant wishes to challenge this [§l 7, §68]. | + | 170. The superseding indictment is brought on the basis of the rule of law and not to prosecute the defendant for his political opinions. A motion for selective prosecution (which could be brought on the basis that the prosecution was brought for a discriminatory purpose) may be filed if the defendant wishes to challenge this [§17, §68]. |
| 171. If extradited, the defendant may challenge the charge against him at first instance with one appeal as of right, and further discretionary appeals as far as the Supreme Court [§67]. | 171. If extradited, the defendant may challenge the charge against him at first instance with one appeal as of right, and further discretionary appeals as far as the Supreme Court [§67]. | ||